• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

**WON** Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • **WON** Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

    Hi
    Received a claim from Lowells dated 15 September 2016.
    I have followed all the advice about the CCA and CPR letters and these have been received and acknowledged.
    Amount approx: £1641.74
    Claimant:
    Lowell Portfolio Ltd
    Solicitor:
    Lowell Solicitors
    Original Creditor:
    JD Williams
    Particulars of Claim: Please type out in full excluding names/account numbers
    The claim is for the sum of £1641.74 due by the defendant under a non-regulated JD Williams account with the reference ********
    The Defendant failed to maintain a contractual payments required under the terms of the account agreement, The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 20/Dec/2012, notice of whch has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings to the sum of £131.34.
    The claimant claims the sum of £1773.08

    Is the debt Statute Barred?
    Unsure, on paperwork received yesterday the last item on one of their exhibits is 23/10/2010.
    List any letters you have sent: CCA and CPR
    Any Other Info:
    I received a letter yesterday from S.Kamkar (Legal Asistant) including a witness statement for a hearing on 2nd February 2017.
    Background:
    The claim relates to an agreement dated 10 August 2009 between the defendant and JD Williams..... A copy of the agreement can be found attached "SK1" The defendants account was in default as of 30 November 2010 and a default note was sent to the defendant.
    Copy of credit agreement SK1 - my signature is not shown and the address has been hand written but not in my hand writing.
    SK2 - Copy of Transactions, with last transaction showing as 22/10/2010.
    SK3 - Notice of Assignment
    SK4 - Copies of letters purporting to show an attempt at settlement.
    SK5 - A copy of a letter sent dates 4th October 2016 (never received) asking for proof of a medical condition that was disclosed (I am epileptic and got myself into an awful lot of fnancial difficulty following diagnosis after a car crash)
    The final paragraph of the letter states that the claimants position is such that it has provided the defendant with sufficient evidence of the Agreement and the debt and he has the use and benefit if the account. For the reasons stated, the claimant submits that it is entitled to recover the sum claimed and the defendant is liable to pay the same.
    It then goes on to state
    As no Defence disclosing any merit whatsoever has been produced by the defendant, the claimant respectfully invites the court to strike out the defence and award judgement in favour of the claimant.

    I'm really worried as to what my options are now. I can provide proof of my medical condition, unfortunately Epilepsy doesn't just disappear and would have sent proof if as claimed they had sent the letter.

    Any advice/help would be gratefully appreciated.
    Last edited by Deal1970; 18th January 2017, 17:00:PM.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970 - Court hearing 2nd Feb :-(

    Originally posted by Deal1970 View Post
    Hi
    Received a claim from Lowells dated 15 September 2016.
    I have followed all the advice about the CCA and CPR letters and these have been received and acknowledged.
    Amount approx: £1641.74
    Claimant:
    Lowell Portfolio Ltd
    Solicitor:
    Lowell Solicitors
    Original Creditor:
    JD Williams
    Particulars of Claim: Please type out in full excluding names/account numbers
    The claim is for the sum of £1641.74 due by the defendant under a non-regulated JD Williams account with the reference ********
    The Defendant failed to maintain a contractual payments required under the terms of the account agreement, The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 20/Dec/2012, notice of whch has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings to the sum of £131.34.
    The claimant claims the sum of £1773.08

    Is the debt Statute Barred?
    Unsure, on paperwork received yesterday the last item on one of their exhibits is 23/10/2010.
    List any letters you have sent: CCA and CPR
    Any Other Info:
    I received a letter yesterday from S.Kamkar (Legal Asistant) including a witness statement for a hearing on 2nd February 2017.
    Background:
    The claim relates to an agreement dated 10 August 2009 between the defendant and JD Williams..... A copy of the agreement can be found attached "SK1" The defendants account was in default as of 30 November 2010 and a default note was sent to the defendant.
    Copy of credit agreement SK1 - my signature is not shown and the address has been hand written but not in my hand writing.
    SK2 - Copy of Transactions, with last transaction showing as 22/10/2010.
    SK3 - Notice of Assignment
    SK4 - Copies of letters purporting to show an attempt at settlement.
    SK5 - A copy of a letter sent dates 4th October 2016 (never received) asking for proof of a medical condition that was disclosed (I am epileptic and got myself into an awful lot of fnancial difficulty following diagnosis after a car crash)
    The final paragraph of the letter states that the claimants position is such that it has provided the defendant with sufficient evidence of the Agreement and the debt and he has the use and benefit if the account. For the reasons stated, the claimant submits that it is entitled to recover the sum claimed and the defendant is liable to pay the same.
    It then goes on to state
    As no Defence disclosing any merit whatsoever has been produced by the defendant, the claimant respectfully invites the court to strike out the defence and award judgement in favour of the claimant.

    I'm really worried as to what my options are now. I can provide proof of my medical condition, unfortunately Epilepsy doesn't just disappear and would have sent proof if as claimed they had sent the letter.

    Any advice/help would be gratefully appreciated.
    Please, anyone ?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

      Have you filed your Witness Statement by the deadline given in the court's Directions (typically 14 days before the hearing)?

      If not you may need to do that now.

      Di

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

        Originally posted by Diana M View Post
        Have you filed your Witness Statement by the deadline given in the court's Directions (typically 14 days before the hearing)?

        If not you may need to do that now.

        Di
        Thanks Di
        I'm completely lost, no I haven't, I thought I'd done everything I needed to !!
        Do I make my own or is there a template, I don't remember seeing one in any packs and I've been through them again and again, I don't really know what to say in all honesty. Thought things were going too well.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

          http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...ness-Statement
          CAVEAT LECTOR

          This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

          You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
          Cohen, Herb


          There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
          gets his brain a-going.
          Phelps, C. C.


          "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
          The last words of John Sedgwick

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

            Many thanks for the link and thanks for those who have helped so far.
            Having read through some of the examples I'm still stuck on my defense, I can prove the medical part and am awaiting documents to send as evidence, however the solicitors have sent a copy of an agreement that shows an address I would have lived at the time but with no signature, I'm also unsure on where I stand with the dates and whether it would be statue barred (or is it the case that they have served papers just before the time was up)
            Absolutely at my wits end, I've just started to get back on track after not being able to work for 5 years because of the medical issues I've faced and I'm bogging and worrying myself down due to struggling to find the correct wording to defend this.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

              Hi Deal

              Have you received notification from the court with details of the allocation to track (I'm guessing Small Claims), & instructions to send disclosure documents to the court & the Claimant/solicitors (usually within 14 days of the hearing)?
              It would be useful to pinpoint exactly what stage in the court proceedings you are at.
              CAVEAT LECTOR

              This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

              You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
              Cohen, Herb


              There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
              gets his brain a-going.
              Phelps, C. C.


              "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
              The last words of John Sedgwick

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
                It would be useful to pinpoint exactly what stage in the court proceedings you are at.
                The hearing is listed for 2nd February (12 days time) and the Claimant has filed and served their WS plus Exhibits.

                Di

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                  Originally posted by Diana M View Post
                  The hearing is listed for 2nd February (12 days time) and the Claimant has filed and served their WS plus Exhibits.

                  Di
                  Good morning, Di.

                  Lol!

                  I can see from the info given that Lowells have informed the OP re the hearing date, etc.
                  (Just between you & me, if they told me that the colour of an orange is orange, I'd want to check on that.
                  & they'd be wrong!)

                  CAVEAT LECTOR

                  This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                  You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                  Cohen, Herb


                  There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                  gets his brain a-going.
                  Phelps, C. C.


                  "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                  The last words of John Sedgwick

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                    Originally posted by Deal1970 View Post
                    "As no Defence disclosing any merit whatsoever has been produced by the defendant, the claimant respectfully invites the court to strike out the defence and award judgement in favour of the claimant."

                    I'm really worried as to what my options are now. I can provide proof of my medical condition, unfortunately Epilepsy doesn't just disappear and would have sent proof
                    That last paragraph in the Claimant's WS implies that you did file a Defence but in their view it has no legal merit.

                    What did you put in your Defence?

                    Sadly health issues is not a legal argument in a debt claim even though they may cause financial hardship.

                    You may need to include any s.77-79 CCA credit agreement, Default Notice, NOA, and s.86 arguments in your WS. They seem to have anticipated that in theirs.

                    Di

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                      Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
                      Good morning, Di.

                      I can see from the info given that Lowells have informed the OP re the hearing date, etc.
                      Morning Charity.

                      Maybe it's not the Trial (hearing) maybe it's a hearing in relation to a Summary Judgment application to strike out the Defence as having no prospects of success?

                      Perhaps their WS is in support of that application?

                      Just guessing until the OP confirms where things are at.

                      Di

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                        Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
                        Hi Deal

                        Have you received notification from the court with details of the allocation to track (I'm guessing Small Claims), & instructions to send disclosure documents to the court & the Claimant/solicitors (usually within 14 days of the hearing)?
                        It would be useful to pinpoint exactly what stage in the court proceedings you are at.
                        Hi
                        I have received a notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing), date set at 2nd Feb 2017 at 10 am, in my panic I have overlooked the 14 days part and this is entirely my fault through complete ignorance on the procedures (lesson about to be learned I think)
                        I was then offered mediation, which the mediator himself advised that as I'd had no information up until that date that I should go along with refuting the claim until I received information asked for, I heard nothing until 3 days ago with all the information requested but still dispute their copy of the agreement as it is not in my handwriting and there is no signature.
                        I used my illness to explain that I have memory issues due to the accident and cannot remember details from around this time, Lowells claim they asked me for details of the illness but I have never received this letter (why don't firms use recorded delivery as I would !!??)
                        I have no paperwork relating to this claim, I can't dispute it because I don't even remember taking it out, there is nothing on my credit file to say as such and I'm certainly not in a position to pay back, although if I do actually owe the amount I'm happy to pay it back, it's more a question of how can they say I owe the money with no signed documentation etc.. ?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                          So you need to file a WS asap.

                          Can you post/type up your Defence with all personal details removed to see exactly what you said.

                          If you say you have "no recollection" of receiving certain documents then the onus is on the Claimant to prove they were sent.

                          If if you say you suffer from memory loss issues they may turn this against you by saying they did send stuff but you must have forgotten.

                          Di

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                            Originally posted by Diana M View Post
                            So you need to file a WS asap.

                            Can you post/type up your Defence with all personal details removed to see exactly what you said.

                            If you say you have "no recollection" of receiving certain documents then the onus is on the Claimant to prove they were sent.

                            If if you say you suffer from memory loss issues they may turn this against you by saying they did send stuff but you must have forgotten.

                            Di
                            Thanks Di
                            I will do that later today.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Lowell Solicitors V Deal1970

                              According to the info posted above, the agreement is dated August 2009.

                              If it was taken out online, a wet ink signature is not required.
                              CAVEAT LECTOR

                              This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                              You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                              Cohen, Herb


                              There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                              gets his brain a-going.
                              Phelps, C. C.


                              "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                              The last words of John Sedgwick

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

                              Announcement

                              Collapse

                              Support LegalBeagles


                              Donate with PayPal button

                              LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

                              See more
                              See less

                              Court Claim ?

                              Guides and Letters
                              Loading...



                              Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

                              Find a Law Firm


                              Working...
                              X