Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: European Court of Human Rights: Employers right to snoop on workers emails

  • Share
  • Thread Tools
  • Display
  1. #1
    leclerc's Avatar

    VIP Member

    May 2010
    61 Post(s)

    Default European Court of Human Rights: Employers right to snoop on workers emails{"itemid":["001-159906"]}

    The above case is on the various media websites. My understanding is that it is not against article 8: right to family and private life. He supposedly told the employer that he had messenger solely for the purposes of the business whereas he used it for personal contacts. Basically they argued that he was using his work time for personal business despite claiming not to and therefore there was no expectation of privacy.

    There was one dissenting opinion and you can read this for yourself. The dissenting judge was stating that there should be clear and unambiguous internet useage policies.

    - - - Updated - - -

    You'll need to copy and paste the link into another browser for it to work unless site team can do some magic with this to make it work without doing so
    "Family means that no one gets forgotten or left behind"
    (quote from David Ogden Stiers)

  2. #2
    enaid's Avatar

    LB Team Member

    Jun 2007
    89 Post(s)

    Default Re: European Court of Human Rights: Employers right to snoop on workers emails

    Employers can read workers' private messages sent via chat software and webmail accounts during working hours, judges have ruled.

    The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) said a firm that read a worker's Yahoo Messenger chats sent while he was at work was within its rights.
    Judges said he had breached the company's rules and that his employer had a right to check on his activities.
    Such policies must also protect workers against unfettered snooping, they said.
    The judges, sitting in the ECHR in Strasbourg, handed down their decision on Tuesday. It binds all countries that have ratified the European Convention on Human Rights, which includes Britain.

    The worker, an engineer in Romania, had hoped the court would rule that his employer had breached his right to confidential correspondence when it accessed his messages and subsequently sacked him in 2007.
    His employer had discovered that he was using Yahoo Messenger for personal contacts, as well as professional ones.
    Because it believed it was accessing a work account, the judges said, the firm had not erred.

    They dismissed the man's request, saying that it was not "unreasonable that an employer would want to verify that employees were completing their professional tasks during working hours"

    The judges said: "The employer acted within its disciplinary powers since, as the domestic courts found, it had accessed the Yahoo Messenger account on the assumption that the information in question had been related to professional activities and that such access had therefore been legitimate. The court sees no reason to question these findings."
    Yahoo Messenger

    The man, named Bogdan Barbulescu, had already lost his case in Romania's domestic courts and appealed to the ECHR.
    He argued that his right to a private life had been breached when his employer had read a log of messages on a Yahoo Messenger account he had set up for work, as well as that from a second personal one.

    Mr Barbulescu's employer had banned its staff from sending personal messages at work.
    To check his account, the judges said, it had been necessary for his employer to access his records.
    The judges said this was a proportionate step because the firm did not access other information stored on his work computer.
    And they added that Mr Barbulescu had had prior warning that the company could check his messages.

    'Blanket ban'

    Despite claims about the second, personal account, the judges only discussed the work account in their ruling.
    The device used to send the messages was owned by the employer, and the judges did not elaborate on whether it would have made any difference if he had used a personal device.
    One of the eight judges disagreed with the decision, saying that a blanket ban on personal internet use was unacceptable.
    Going forward, he added, all employers should clearly explain any rules that would allow them to check on their workers' online activities.
    "All employees should be notified personally of the said policy and consent to it explicitly," he wrote.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    : 17th June 2015, 15:35:PM
  2. Replies: 0
    : 11th December 2013, 14:49:PM
  3. New European Human Rights Ruling / Rent Arrears
    By Latch Key Kid in forum News and Information
    Replies: 3
    : 21st January 2013, 13:32:PM
  4. Cameron & Human Rights
    By charitynjw in forum News and Information
    Replies: 2
    : 25th January 2012, 10:15:AM
  5. European Court of Human Rights
    By hicskis in forum Bank Charge Claims
    Replies: 1
    : 20th July 2010, 18:35:PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Contact Us

© Celame (UK) Ltd 2017
LegalBeagles® are DPA Registered No. ZA158014
LegalBeagles® is the trading name of CELAME (UK) LIMITED ( 09220332 )
Registered Address: 25 Moorgate, London, England, EC2R 6AY
VAT registration number 206 9740 02
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.3 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Celame (UK) Ltd Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2017 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

To find out more about managing your money and getting free advice, visit the Money Advice Service,an independent service set up to help people manage their money.