• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

A and B v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council [2014] EWFC 47 (05 December 2014)

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A and B v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council [2014] EWFC 47 (05 December 2014)

    More...
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: A and B v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council [2014] EWFC 47 (05 December 2014

    I read the above case and it is horrifyingly sad that a judge has to make a choice as to whether the adoptive parents have the child or the aunt of the child. Awful thing really but the right decision.

    My first thought when I read Rotherham was something about sexual abuse but this was definitely not the case.
    "Family means that no one gets forgotten or left behind"
    (quote from David Ogden Stiers)

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X