• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Civil claim following employee theft

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Civil claim following employee theft

    Hi all,

    Just over 2 years ago, I was fired from my job with a high-street retailer for gross misconduct. Over a few months leading up to that point I had, prompted by extreme financial difficulties, manipulated the till system to steal money. It was several hundred pounds by the time it was uncovered. When I was challenged by a company loss prevention investigator I immediately admitted full culpability. After the investigation I was handed over to the police. After being fired I attended court, representing myself and pleaded guilty. Due to a complete absence of any history of criminal activities and good character, I was ordered to repay the amount stolen plus fees. I was given a few months to do this, and I paid the full amount within the deadline.

    3 days ago I received a letter from Business Loss Prevention (a Derby-based company) on behalf of my former employer. The first thing I want to point out is that they spell my surname incorrectly. They are bringing a civil claim against me for £1242.32. This is far in excess of the amount that I stole (and paid back). They state that if I pay the claim within 7 days I can pay a reduced amount of £993.86.
    Now they do have a breakdown of the claim, see below (copied exactly as shown on the letter, including the pointless 3 decimal places; the sloppiness is almost as annoying as the claim)

    Hours/miles Hourly Rate Total Fringe@37% Total
    0
    0
    AB Investigation 16 30 480 177.6 657.6
    CD Travelling 2 20 40 14.8 54.8
    CD Investigation 6 20 120 44.4 164.4
    CD Train 15 0 0 15
    CD Food & Drink 15 15
    0
    906.8
    Admin Fee @ 37% 335.516
    Total case value 1242.316

    AB and CD (initials which I have changed) are, I believe, the 2 company investigators responsible for dealing with my situation. One to investigate it and one to conduct the investigation itself (although whilst one conducted it there were two investigators present).

    Now I know I committed a crime, I always conceded my guilt and I paid back everything I stole. I can even understand that companies have the right to make these civil claims. But I guess what is making me pause is the amount and how that is determined. Obviously they have gone to some length to justify the claim amount, but I still have questions/observations:

    1) What on earth is Fringe?
    2) There is absolutely no way that loss prevention investigators get paid £30 per hour working for that retailer. That's equivalent to £60K per year. I was a manager so I understand the payscales involved.
    3) I am under the impression that the company has to demonstrate that the disruption caused by my actions are worth this claim. But it's AB and CD's job to deal with these situations....they are literally doing their day job. And am I seriously paying for their lunch?!

    Any insight you can provide would be awesome. Most of the information I can find online (eg the CAB website) is skewed to shoplifters and people who contest the crime. My situation is obviously different to that.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Civil claim following employee theft

    Hi and Welcome.#

    BLP... now that's a new company for us, but doubtlessly they follow the same pattern as the rest of their ilk.

    Yes, your ex employer could sue you for losses and damages you caused them, but as you suggest they have to prove their losses.
    BLP can't initiate court action, it has to be the employer, so I suppose the letter is full of "ifs and buts, may and mights".

    My advice would be to ignore, but it would (or may!) help if you could post up a copy of the letter suitably sanitised.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Civil claim following employee theft

      If there's already been a court case and the money has been paid, wouldn't that make it difficult for the company to claim more now [MENTION=39710]des8[/MENTION]?? I mean ... they should have added all these costs etc... at the time shouldn't they??
      Debt is like any other trap, easy enough to get into, but hard enough to get out of.

      It doesn't matter where your journey begins, so long as you begin it...

      recte agens confido

      ~~~~~

      Any advice I provide is given without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

      I can be emailed if you need my help loading pictures/documents to your thread. My email address is Kati@legalbeagles.info
      But please include a link to your thread so I know who you are.

      Specialist advice can be sought via our sister site JustBeagle

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Civil claim following employee theft

        When you say they are bringing a civil claim against you, do you mean they have issued court papers or have just started chasing you ? Have the company previously asked for any recompense for costs associated with the offence at all ?

        They will have to justify the breakdown, and evidence the travel etc. Presumably the 15 next to Train and Food/Drink should be in the Total column. Where (if you know) were AB and CD based that they had to travel and have lunch out to investigate ? So AB gets paid £30 an hour and CD gets £20 an hour, nice work if you can get it lol. No idea what a fringe is either, but they seem to add another 37% on as an admin fee as well, so really doubling that up.

        It would be interesting to see the letter they have sent you.

        The Director of the company is a Solicitor ( http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/...ermina-webster ) from her Linked In looks like she used to work at CRS ( a more well known civil recovery outfit)

        Seems they do a No Win No Fee service so could just be your ex-employer has been marketed to and are just trying it on.
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Civil claim following employee theft

          Thanks so much for the replies guys, I have included a redacted copy of the top letter to this reply.
          Amethyst; this is the first news I have had regarding a civil claim from anyone, so I suppose it is the start of the chase
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Civil claim following employee theft

            Okayyyyyyyy. Not great grammatically is it. And not hugely compliant with pre-action protocols.

            As this is the first you have heard I think I would be inclined to file it away and await further correspondance from them for the moment. If they do continue then consider a response ( which would be basically asking them to quantify/justify/evidence those 'costs' ( and find out what 'fringe' is lol ) If they do just file a court claim then defend it.

            In my view as you have already been fined by the courts and have repaid the amount taken - you have had your 'punishment' and that is that. Civil claims do have some basis but it's become too much like speculative invoicing.

            Do you know the employees who carried out the investigation btw? what their jobs actually are?

            I'll try dig some case law up for you in a while ( Friday school/work/college run )
            #staysafestayhome

            Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

            Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Civil claim following employee theft

              In 2011 the Law Commission published a consultation paper - entitled Reforming Consumer Redress for Misleading and Aggressive Practices - in which it stated:
              "If the theft caused significant disruption to the retailer's business, then the law allows the store to claim for the staff time diverted to dealing with the effects of the disruption. However, the [retailer] would need to prove that the disruption was significant, and that staff time as actually diverted. The law does not generally allow fixed sum penalties. Nor does it allow [retailers] to apportion the overheads incurred for security and surveillance to individual shoplifters."
              The principle applies to any type of loss caused by a third party:
              cf
              http://swarb.co.uk/aerospace-publishing-ltd-and-another-v-thames-water-utilities-ltd-ca-11-jan-2007/

              It is also arguable that The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 apply to misleading and unfair practices in collecting debts and other payments, including alleged costs caused by theft.
              So has your employer actually instructed BLP to initiate court action as claimed (it will cost them if they lose!), or have they just passed it over following a marketing approach with vague instructions about making some sort of recovery and BLP are misleading you?

              In view of the poor quality of this letter as an LBA i would , as per [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION]< file it for the time being to see what else they produce.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Civil claim following employee theft

                [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION] I have gone through my old documentation and have the job titles:
                AB was Loss Prevention Manager
                CD was District Loss Prevention Manager
                Odd that the more senior one gets paid less!?

                Also it only occurred to me today but my current address (whilst one I lived at previously) is not the one I was living at when I was dismissed 2 years ago. In fact my dismissal letter has a different address. Is it odd that BLP have my newer address which my former employer has no reason to be aware of?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Civil claim following employee theft

                  Out of sheer curiousity I googled "Fringe legal term".

                  The only thing that came up was fringe benefits (you're paying for their wage benefits?!?) I literally can't find anything else!!

                  What is a fringe expense?


                  Human resource management: Compensation in addition to direct wages or salaries, such as company car, house allowance, medical insurance, paid holidays, pension schemes, subsidized meals. Some fringe benefits are regarded part of a taxable income.






                  PLEASE NOTE: I work irregular hours including nights and sleep in shifts. If I have not responded in 48 hours, please ask an admin to Messenger me!

                  "If you ever feel alone, remember, I am just the other side of the rainbow, or just south of the North Star. Whichever is closer." - A.J Murphy. 17/3/1974 - 16/03/1997 (RIP babe <3)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well just a quick update: I have received a further 2 letters (although the second one claimed to be the 3rd sent).
                    The latest letter which I received a few days ago states:

                    Dear Mr ************

                    We write further to previous correspondence on this matter.

                    We have made a concerted effort to resolve this claim, but are disappointed to note that you have not contacted us in order to settle this mater (misspelled) out of court.

                    Our client may now proceed to court in order to obtain a county court judgment (misspelled) against you.

                    If they do issue Court proceedings they will seek an order from the court that they are awarded costs and interest in addition to the sum claimed above.

                    Their claim with therefore include:

                    a. Claim Value as above
                    b. Interest due under the County Courts Act at 8%
                    c. Court fees and
                    d. Fixed Legal Costs

                    We are however aware of our obligation under the Civil Procedure Rules to make every attempt to settle a claim without having to resort to Court action. Therefore we are willing to honour the original claim value until 4pm on the 7th day after the date of this letter.

                    If you do not contact us within 7 days to settle the claim in full, or to arrange a repayment plan with us, our client will reserve the right to issue proceedings without further notice.

                    Yours sincerely,

                    Business Loss Prevention Limited

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They don't seem to have learnt from the RLP Oxford case! They are claiming for the cost of two loss prevention officers but investigating a loss is exactly what they are being paid to do. They would have been paid anyway even they did not have your case to handle and therefore their salary is not a loss. I believe the judge in the Oxford case commented on this. Here's a Link to the matter.

                      Perhaps you could write to them pointing them in the direction of the RLP case and the comments made by HHJ Harris about the wages of the security staff not being an expense occasioned by the action of the defendants but money that would have been paid anyway.
                      Earlier this year we published the judgment in the case A Retailer v Ms B & Ms K . The case represented the first fully contested proceedings for civil recovery demands issued by the controversial Retail Loss Prevention Ltd (RLP) on behalf of major retailers attempting to claim loss suffered…
                      Last edited by ostell; 4th February 2018, 12:59:PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ostell View Post
                        They don't seem to have learnt from the RLP Oxford case! They are claiming for the cost of two loss prevention officers but investigating a loss is exactly what they are being paid to do. They would have been paid anyway even they did not have your case to handle and therefore their salary is not a loss. I believe the judge in the Oxford case commented on this. Here's a Link to the matter.

                        Perhaps you could write to them pointing them in the direction of the RLP case and the comments made by HHJ Harris about the wages of the security staff not being an expense occasioned by the action of the defendants but money that would have been paid anyway.
                        Thanks for the response Ostell; that sums up exactly how I have felt about this process, the idea that I am reimbursing someone for doing the job that they are paid to do. In my case over-paying them :/

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I wouldn't bother even acknowledging their existence, mlet alone write to them.
                          Writing only seems to make these firms redouble their efforts.
                          That letter is full of "mights" and "mays" and is an invitation to pay, backed by veiled threats.
                          Do nothing unless a proper letter before action is received. (the chances of which are very remote!!)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It was just a suggestion to write to them to let them know that you know that what they are claiming is a load of rubbish and previous attempts at this have cost the claimant dearly. Might just stop further letters.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              As the OP has not consented to these parasites being the controllers of their data then I'd be making a complaint to the ICO under the DPA 1998.

                              They are not processing the OP's data fairly or lawfully as they don't satisfy the requirements of schedule 2. They cannot satisfy a single one: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/schedule/2

                              I might be inclined if I were the OP to write a similarly speculative letter to my former employer regarding them disclosing my personal information to third parties without my consent citing the Data Protection Act 1998 S55(1) and enclosing a copy of the letters to prove it. I would probably use words like "wishing to settle the matter amicably and without need for further action," that I "might take legal advice which could result in court proceedings being issued against them." I'd point out also that DPA 1998 S55(3) states: "A person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence."

                              The employer was well within the DPA to disclose the OP's personal data to the police and courts, but are bang out of order in disclosing it to a private company without the OP's consent.

                              Play them at their own game.
                              COMPLETING AN N180 DIRECTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE (SMALL CLAIMS TRACK) GUIDE

                              My posts here are based on my experience of a variety of life events. I have no formal legal training & if in doubt take professional legal advice or contact CAB. If you follow anything I write here you do so at your own risk & I accept no liability for any loss, costs or other outcomes.

                              Private messages are disabled as help is only offered publicly. I do not come on here in the evening, at weekends or on public holidays.

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X