• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Prospects of a successful challenge (LGO decision - Judicial Review)

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prospects of a successful challenge (LGO decision - Judicial Review)

    The LGO was unpersuaded by the representations made in the letter before claim (pre-action protocol for judicial review) arguing that the Ombudsman had erred in law in determining that there was insufficient evidence to find the offending Council had acted with fault, and therefore decided against investigating the concerns.

    In summary, the LGO's legal firm backed up the Ombudsman's decision on the basis that the Council, which had been shown manifestly to have obtained a Council Tax Liability Order erroneously, was not at fault for deciding against applying to quash the Order because it was under no legal obligation to (disregarding the duty to exercise discretion with good judgement).

    Also that the case law relied on showed the courts had consistently recognised the Ombudsman's wide discretion and would only interfere in the clearest cases of unlawfulness (a significantly high threshold to satisfy) which the LGO's lawyer considers has been nowhere near achieved in the representations and so any claim for Judicial Review will be bound to fail.

    The punch line however is the threat of costs to deter a claim (para 5.16, LGO's letter of response)

    "
    ....should you issue Judicial Review proceedings and should these be unsuccessful at the permission stage or at a substantive hearing, the Ombudsman will seek an order that you pay the costs of the proceedings. Otherwise, the costs of the proceedings would have to be borne from public funds. Typically the cost if the Ombudsman files an Acknowledgment of Service is approximately £2,000. Should the matter go to a substantive hearing then those costs will be considerably higher.

    It looks like the LGO has all the cards stacked in its favour, but it would be interesting to know what the costs, described as "considerably higher" would likely to be on top of the £2,000 for filing an Acknowledgment of Service? Also does anyone know whether an individual has ever been successful in a judicial review claim against the LGO?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Prospects of a successful challenge (LGO decision - Judicial Review)

    Originally posted by outlawlgo View Post
    It looks like the LGO has all the cards stacked in its favour, but it would be interesting to know what the costs, described as "considerably higher" would likely to be on top of the £2,000 for filing an Acknowledgment of Service? Also does anyone know whether an individual has ever been successful in a judicial review claim against the LGO?
    If historic figures are anything to go by then the prospects look bleak. The probability of a successful challenge would appear to be zero plus a good chance that you'll lose your home.

    Local Government Ombudsman dir___

    "
    .....It must become possible to complain about maladministration when it is committed by a council Ombudsman to an independent tribunal; at present, the citizen is restricted to either complaining to the local authority Ombudsman that the Ombudsman's findings are unjust, or else applying to take the decision to judicial review, which can be a very expensive procedure and is only open to those who are so poor they can get legal aid, or so wealthy that they can afford to lose potentially tens of thousands of pounds.

    The prospects of success at judicial review are also very poor: in the financial years 2001-2004, Nick Raynsford MP reports judges to have found in favour of the council Ombudsman in all 25 cases taken to judicial review. Even when an appeal is successful, the judge only has the power to ask the Local Government Ombudsman to take another look at the case. This does not seem like a fair appeal system against a local authority Ombudsman service....

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X