Tweet
We received a copy of the JR papers today. I don't know how to post PDF's but would be glad to email them out if you inbox me an address.
There's 89 pages of legalese which is making my head hurt already - I'm not ashamed to say I'm out of my depth here, so will not offer any amateur opinion that's more likely to be misleading than anything else, until our solicitors have had a read through.
Word for word though, paragraph 15:
Accordingly, by this application the Claimant seeks from the Court, in summary, orders:
a) quashing the Policy Statement, including the DISP Amendments, on the basis that the FSA's reasons for issuing it are flawed by error of law and/or are irrational;
b) quashing the FOS Guidance
c) giving declaratory relief in relation to the applicability of the Open Letter Standards to the position before the introduction of ICOB in January 2005.
Discussion - Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold - Legal Beagles Consumer Forum
There's 89 pages of legalese which is making my head hurt already - I'm not ashamed to say I'm out of my depth here, so will not offer any amateur opinion that's more likely to be misleading than anything else, until our solicitors have had a read through.
Word for word though, paragraph 15:
Accordingly, by this application the Claimant seeks from the Court, in summary, orders:
a) quashing the Policy Statement, including the DISP Amendments, on the basis that the FSA's reasons for issuing it are flawed by error of law and/or are irrational;
b) quashing the FOS Guidance
c) giving declaratory relief in relation to the applicability of the Open Letter Standards to the position before the introduction of ICOB in January 2005.
Discussion - Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold - Legal Beagles Consumer Forum
Comment