This is just a general question about employment judges reviewing their decision so doesn't need tagging onto my previous threads.
If the employer and employee cant agree on a vital issue which would tip the outcome either way, but there is indisputable evidence to support one of them, and the existence of this evidence is made known to the judge prior to the review, would the judge have to view this evidence or, would it be reasonable for him not request the evidence and make his decision based on who gave the more convincing argument at the review?
If the employer and employee cant agree on a vital issue which would tip the outcome either way, but there is indisputable evidence to support one of them, and the existence of this evidence is made known to the judge prior to the review, would the judge have to view this evidence or, would it be reasonable for him not request the evidence and make his decision based on who gave the more convincing argument at the review?
Comment